AI Model Comparisons

Side-by-side pricing, benchmarks and specs for frontier models from Anthropic and OpenAI.

Last updated 2026-09-30 · Vendor data sourced from Anthropic and OpenAI

All Models at a Glance

SpecClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Astra
VendorAnthropicAnthropicAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 22, 2026Sep 28, 2026Sep 3, 2026
Input / output (per MTok)$10 / $50$4 / $20$2 / $10$10 / $50
Batch input / output$5 / $25$2 / $10$1 / $5$5 / $25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens (300K on Batch API)128K tokens (300K on Batch API)128K tokens
LatencySlowerModerateFastSlower
ThinkingAdaptive, always on, cannot be disabledAdaptive, always on, cannot be disabledAdaptive; can be tuned with between_tools (no up-front thinking at effort <= high)Reasoning model, effort configurable
Default efforthighmediumhighmedium
Knowledge cutoffJun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Apr 2026

Same-Vendor Comparisons (Anthropic)

Cross-Vendor Comparisons (Anthropic vs OpenAI)

Model Comparison FAQ

  • Which Claude model should I use?

    Sonnet 5.5 is the cheapest and fastest of the three and fits routine coding and everyday API work. Opus 5.5 leads most benchmarks and suits long-running agents and complex reasoning. Fable 5.1 is the premium tier at $10 / $50 per million tokens and is worth it only if your own evals show it pays off.

  • Claude vs GPT: which is cheaper?

    Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens and Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 / $10, versus $10 / $50 for GPT-6 Astra. Per-token price is not the same as per-task cost, so benchmark on your own workload before deciding.

  • How often is this data updated?

    Specs and prices come from each vendor's official documentation and are re-verified whenever a model or price changes. Every comparison page shows its last-updated date.